At first glance, mergers and acquisitions look very similar, and people often use the two words interchangeably. However, there is a difference between merger and acquisition transactions. Understanding that difference helps you determine the appropriate approach for your company as well as how to respond appropriately to offers you receive from other companies for purchase or partnership.
The main difference between the two is the business restructuring that occurs as a result. When two companies merge, they become one company and one brand. For example, when the security companies AlliedBarton and Universal Services joined, the individual companies became a new business entity, now known as Allied Universal.
In contrast, an acquisition involves the purchase of one company by another. That company becomes a subsidiary of the parent company or remains a separate product. For example, when AT&T bought Time Warner, the two brands remained separate.
There are other things to note regarding the difference between merger and acquisition deals. These can have significant implications for the companies involved, especially regarding management structures and financial outcomes.
Mergers usually require companies to cooperate to decide their business strategy and operations. Acquisitions involve only one decision-maker, which is typically the purchasing company.
When merging, there is usually a reorganization of the legal structures of both companies to form one unified company. In an acquisition, the target company is absorbed into the parent company and ceases to exist as a separate legal entity.
Both mergers and acquisitions must comply with specific legal requirements, including approvals from governmental or industry regulatory bodies. For example, in the U.S., any merger or acquisition that crosses a certain size threshold must be approved by the Federal Trade Commission.
The payment structure and terms can differ in a merger compared to an acquisition. In some cases, one company may pay for another mostly in cash; in other cases, both parties may exchange shares of stock. Each party's valuation also plays an important role and can vary greatly depending on the industry and market conditions.
Another difference between merger and acquisition deals is that mergers involve a combination of debt and equity. Acquisitions, on the other hand, typically rely more heavily on cash payments or equity swaps.
In the corporate strategy landscape, mergers and acquisitions offer advantages and disadvantages. These can significantly impact the future of individual organizations and the emerging business entity.
Here are the main advantages:
There are also some downsides:
There is a difference between merger and acquisition transactions when handling data protection and the cloud. In a merger, Cloudficient ensures seamless integration of data systems. We preserve information integrity while helping you unlock the collaborative features of the cloud. In an acquisition scenario, we ensure the assimilation of the acquired company's data into the parent company's data infrastructure. Our team also maintains operational continuity without compromising data security. Contact us to learn more.
With unmatched next generation migration technology, Cloudficient is revolutionizing the way businesses retire legacy systems and transform their organization into the cloud. Our business constantly remains focused on client needs and creating product offerings that match them. We provide affordable services that are scalable, fast and seamless.
If you would like to learn more about how to bring Cloudficiency to your migration project, visit our website, or contact us.